Simulation Evidence

Visualizing the Crash:
The "Kill Shot" Graph

We ran a Zero-Inertia grid simulation until failure.
One controller committed suicide. The other predicted the future.

Dr. Tanet 3 min read ID: Grid-00002

In Part 1, we talked about the "Zero Inertia Paradox." It sounded theoretical. So we decided to break things.

We set up a digital twin of a Solar-to-Hydrogen microgrid with Zero Battery Buffer. We introduced a sudden cloud shading event (Solar Drop) at t=1.0s.

Then we let two controllers fight for survival:
1. Standard PID (The Industry Standard)
2. Bangsaen Core™ (Koopman Kalman Safeguard)

Here is the result. No filters. Just raw physics.

PID vs Koopman Voltage Collapse Graph
Fig 1. The "Kill Shot". Red Line = Standard PID (System Crash). Green Line = Koopman (Safe Mode).

Decoding the Crash (The Red Line)

Look closely at the Red Dashed Line in the bottom graph. At t=1.0s, when the solar power drops, the PID controller panics.

In a battery-less system, this is a Suicide Run. Trying to pull more current from a dying source causes the voltage to collapse instantly (Top Graph, Red Line drops to ~10V). The system is dead. The factory stops.

The Digital Sheriff (The Green Line)

Now look at the Green Line.

The Koopman Operator didn't wait for the voltage to drop. It simulated the future state of the system milliseconds before the physics caught up.

"We respect physics. PID tries to fight it. That is why we survive without batteries, and they don't."